I have often said, the best thing about my job is working with social entrepreneurs who change the world through the inspiring work they do. On the other side of that coin lies the hardest part, which is working with those who are experiencing profound difficulties as increasing numbers are, some of whom might even be going, going, gone. These terrible conversations are happening regularly these days. Today, I had that faltering exchange again with another leading social entrepreneur facing such difficult decisions. This is SEL's job and why we are there, to support social enterprises in the good times and bad.
I am glad members call me, just as I am profoundly moved by conversations that start with "Allison, I wanted to tell you myself because I didn't want you to hear from anyone else that we have called in the administrators." I can't tell you the sadness I feel. I am highly motivated to help, as you would expect, and I do evaluate any strategies that might have yet to be visited. No matter how hopeless the situation may appear, there are things that can be done that may just turn the situation around and at the very least it's important to know the correct process for an orderly closure. My hope, shared by us all, is that those who are up against it will be able to turn things around. So much hangs upon their success: jobs, people's futures, social and environmental innovation, advancement for the vulnerable, so, so much.
Most people experience hardship in a recession and although social enterprise has never pretended it is insulated against insolvency, like any enterprise, it can fail as well as succeed, but these are businesses that improve the lives of society's most vulnerable citizens and so carry increased losses because if they can no longer trade, more is lost that straightforward notions of wealth. We should all avoid the consequence of that, if we can.
I've been involved in social enterprise and community networks for a long time, and most recently though supporting www.transitiontowns.org.nz and 2 day bootcamp, and began it with the question: "What is the state of the world?"
ReplyDeleteThat allowed us to share our perspectives, and get real - you know the things we would have talked about - they're on your lips too. From there we made an assumption that resources will, going into the future, get harder to access, and we need to build the Ooooby model in a way that is highly resource efficient. If it turns out our assumption is wrong then we'll be a lean mean efficient machine.
We have to be willing to be flexible in this fast moving transition time, as we go from dependence on fossil fuels to local resilience - the future is local!
There was a hiccough in the post above. The first paragraph should have read:
ReplyDeleteI've been involved in social enterprise and community networks for a long time, and most recently though supporting www.transitiontowns.org.nz and www.ooooby.org. Ooooby recently had a 2 day bootcamp, and began it with the question: "What is the state of the world?"
Alison, It's that kind of story I need to relate today. I tried posting yesterday on the Guardian Sustainable Business network and got my content removed when describing the work, in the context of a discussion about balancing profit with social good, that had been done who passed away several days ago. He died overseas, alone, in pain and confusion for a cause greater than his own life.
ReplyDeleteI remember him telling me once, after visiting one of the childcare institutions he was so determined to change. Describing children who simply closed down to malnutrition, he said 'it's as if they stare into the abyss, and determine they just don't want to be here anymore.
We began working together in 2004, with a proposal to create funding for other social enterprise. It ended in marginalisation, project hijack and ultimately, a death.
http://tinyurl.com/3nmqajm